Archive for March, 2007

aristocrats

Wednesday, March 28th, 2007

Thanks to Matt, I got to spend a couple days at Pinehurst NC, watching the Qualifying round for the NC Open Croquet Tournament. I took Nathaniel with me. The day of the matches, we came correct in whites. This is just before getting in the car to come back. I don’t know why I look like that, except maybe my back is already stiffening for the battle with the Hyundai’s lack of seat comfort.

At Pinehurst

Sphere: Related Content

“The past is never dead.

Friday, March 9th, 2007

It’s not even past.” – Requiem for a Nun

I am just informed that, due to the moving of Hong Kong Auto Repair Collision Inc to new premises, the old building, at the corner of 4th Ave and Prospect Parkway, Brooklyn, has been demolished.

Hong Kong no more

Nothing can take away what we once had.

Hong Kong Auto Repair Collision Inc

Sphere: Related Content

Favorite Band

Friday, March 9th, 2007

I have a new answer for the question: What’s your favorite band?

The Dregs of Humanity

Here’s the wikientry:It's your Move

Olivier

Thursday, March 8th, 2007

Beth M. just hipped (yeah, hipped) me to the fact of Slimbolala, another blog by a Johnnie, c/o 94. Dave is way ahead of me on the post per postable idea ratio. But I feel proud to have pushed his profile views over 3000.

Sphere: Related Content

Dazed and Confused, – you can see clearly, now…

Tuesday, March 6th, 2007

Thanks to Matt buying hundreds of dollars worth of office supplies through the TooAbsent-Amazon store, I just received the Criterion Collection Dazed and Confused. Yes, it is worth it.

In the first five minutes of unwrapping the movie I learned:

Much of the flack that Universal was giving Linklater during the filming and post had to do with… wait for it… the LACK of nudity. Right, cuz how else could it be a teen movie? It either has to be raunchy (Porky’s) or situated in an unreal bubble (Ferris Bueller), or, finally, in our “Non-fat Pork-rinds” (All and Everything) culture: Both (American Pie).

Another point the studio bitched about was the soundtrack. This is like the yearly myopia that people spewed about the iPod (who’ll want THAT!?). The studio wanted contemporary bands (I can’t think of a Blink-182 for 1993. I was, and still am listening to bands that broke up in the 70s) to cover the songs. At this, Linklater threatened to spill blodd (his own) on their doorstep.

Last interesting facts: “Hurricane” by Dylan cost $80,000. “Sweet Emotion” cost $23,000. Ridiculous.
………….
There are not so many deleted scenes that I expected. But there are enough to make a complete plot to the movie.

A statement like that implies that I found the movie plotless since I watched it in awe at Pinckney Street in 1993. Nothing could be further from the truth. The reason I have all of Linklater’s movies is precisely because they remind me that “Plot” (big P) is not the same thing as Story (as in Robert McKee). In terms of this movie, I understand why Linklater was upset at the released cut of the movie. but I can also argue that the deleted scenes do not ADD to THAT movie, because even cutting a lot from his film doesn’t mar what you (ar me, at least) like about his story.

Here’s what I mean… here are a few things I now understand about the PLOT that were missing from the STORY when it was shown in theatres:

The Kiss Statues: In the Emporium, Pickford brings everyone outside to see two statues painted like members of KISS standing in the back of someone’s El Camino. Maybe I’m slow (probably) or I just can’t take my eyes off of Peter Criss make-up, but I never noticed that the statues are not statues OF members of KISS. In the deleted scenes, we see Don and Pickford stealing two bronze statues — 2 of the 3 “Drum and Fife” Bicentennial Group, — from the local library. It is those that are painted like Kiss. I just never noticed the circa 1776 snare drum!

And the, even more surprisingly – At the end of the movie, when the police catch people smoking up on the football field (the “joint subcommittee meeting on the 50-yard line”), they then question the kids about what they are doing with the statues. Though not in the deleted scenes, I would guess that the statues are actually what catch the eyes of the cops, and that is how they find the kids on the field.

This means (AMAZINGLY), that the theft of the statues is (WAS) actually a plot point. It is (was) one of the few pointers along the movie’s narrative. As is usual for Linklater, all the other (the hunting of freshmen, even the fight at the beer bash) points fall away in the service of a beautiful moment, an intriguing discussion.

….

Sphere: Related Content